Before may be a bad deal for startups, especially the ones that are keeping everything all the equity details under wraps.
After is a bad deal for the employee who makes the move, and could be a major bait and switch
Before may be a bad deal for startups, especially the ones that are keeping everything all the equity details under wraps.
After is a bad deal for the employee who makes the move, and could be a major bait and switch
Just because a company isn't forthcoming about all the stock option information doesn't mean that startup is unilaterally bad, in some cases the founders are just naive and don't really understand the complexities of your stock options vs their founder stock. However, if you ask the employer for the necessary information to fill out the website and they won't give it to you, then you essentially have no way to value the stock options and the only rational thing to do is value them at $0.
Many people just value stock options at $0 anyways and I don't agree with that. Stock options can be valuable (for example I've made much more money from startup stock options than from salary). However, if you don't have the full information about the stock options you are receiving you can't understand the risk you are taking and the potential rewards you might get.
A company which won't provide enough information to value an option grant contemporaneous with the written offer is being either abusive or stupid. There exist employment opportunities at companies which are neither abusive nor stupid. Take one of those instead.
Anything and everything in the contract can be taken away from you when you don't have a controlling stake in the company. The contract language is important, but the trustworthiness of the founding team is even more important. At the end of the day, if they are intent on screwing you over, your contract will be just a piece of paper anyways. By asking for the information up front, you get additional information on the trustworthiness and openness of the management team.