> And because I have much better things to do with my poor feminine brain (say, finish off my MSc dissertation, on a novel grammar induction algorithm) I'm not reading a single word of the OP.

By refusing to engage with the substantive arguments made by both uriel & La Griffe du Lion and instead committing the logical fallacies of argumentum ad hominem and appeal to emotion, aren't you actually just making their point? Why not engage & refute instead?