[2] https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2015/11/9-in-10-people-access-...
[2] https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2015/11/9-in-10-people-access-...
It's ridiculously inefficient from the point of the news consumer, which is logical since the news consumer is basically the product in a transaction between content delivery firms and advertisers. New news has always been supported by advertising, but it's gone past the point of absurdity into being economically unsustainable. The western social order is clearly on the verge of a breakdown, not least because public trust of the media is at a nadir and so large segments of the population have abandoned truth-seeking as a component of their media experience and drifted more and more towards validation. This is going to end badly.
> I'm sick to the back teeth
Thank you for keeping this colloquialism in circulation.
Example: m.xkcd.com, m.twitter.com, m.cnn.com, m.fox.com.
It's not true that there wouldn't be point in using teletext even if the same information is available over the web. First of all, the access to teletext is convenient if you just have the TV remote - browsing with so-called "smart TV's" is painful (bad UX) and switching to an actual computer involves changing TV input, and losing possibility to watch TV picture and hear the sound at the same time.
Lots of people here use teletext e.g. to check up sports results and latest news on headline level.
And, as someone pointed out, even the Web version of Text-TV pages is often good: it's snappy and fast even if you only have a 2G connection.
Sweden: http://www.svt.se/svttext/web/pages/100.html
Finland: http://www.yle.fi/tekstitv/txt/P100_01.html
Norway: https://nrk.no/tekst-tv/100/
Denmark: http://www.dr.dk/nav/tekstttv/indexx.htm
(These are the public broadcaster pages; commercial channels have their own, similar ones.)
This is what I liked the best back when I lived in Sweden. It was basically Twitter for news. Also back then news web sites just collapsed when there was a breaking store so that was another plus.
I think it's predictability is it's strength. You get news at 101, sport at 600, weather at 700 and, if you haven't found the button on your remote, the tv schedules at 200.
101 is a Table of Content, domestic news at 110, world news at 120, interesting news at 130, celebrities at 140, TV schedule starts at 300, and 700+ are usually betting ads combined with live sport results.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_Markup_Language
"The STD-B24 specification is derived from an early draft of XHTML 1.0 strict, which it extends and alters. Some subset of CSS 1 and 2 is supported, as well as ECMAScript."
It can look something like this:
Weather/news http://www.city.isa.kagoshima.jp/image/mbc.jpg
Realtime twitter timeline http://trendy.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/column/20101201/1033778...
It's lightweight (and thus fast!) and curated by a reliable news source.
It gives, at any given moment, the 10 most important news items. Try that on a news site.
I use it more than a dozen times a day...