In the Bay Area, if you don't make that kind of money, you better be living in company housing, or you will have trouble renting a closet by yourself.
So yes, enough programmers make more than 120k for the payroll tax to be the same regardless.
I see too many bay area people thinking that ubers and expensive meals out are the "bare minimum".
I am not saying they need more money, but I don't understand how we have gotten to the point of chiding people making six-figures like they work at McDonalds and want a BMW.
Much of the rest of the world does it, no reason North Americans cant.
1: http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Software_Engineer/Sa...
2: https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/san-francisco-software-en...
San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward is a little lower, but both kinds of Software Developers still average over $120K. [1]
Using BLS data, which should be more reliable, for the San Francisco[1] and San Jose[2] metro areas, the average weighted by number of people in the job of annual mean wages for the job categories of "Computer Programmer", "Software Developer, Applications", "Software Developer, Systems" and "Web Developer" is $129,730.54.
[1] http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_41860.htm#15-0000 [2] http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_41940.htm#15-0000
To be fair, as well as regional there is also industry variation, and a lot of people here work in the "Other Information Services" sector -- most online services would seem to be in that category -- which is (at least nationally) significantly above average pay for programming occupations. If that industry-based trend is also true for the region, then $150K for a developer could well be a below-median salary for region/occupation/industry combination.
So if we're not talking about people with the job title "software engineer," but instead talking about people who are software engineers, including people who have a more advanced title, the average salary moves up.
On review of the data, no; I was actually thinking more narrowly of software developers rather than broadly to all programmers, and even then its a little high (though the median salary for application developers (Software Developers, Applications) in the Information sector is close to the cap. [0]
Still, a substantial minority of programmers (broadly speaking) will be making above the cap, so reducing programmer salary in exchange for reduced hours will reduce payroll taxes by a substantially lower percentage than the percentage reduction in salary.
Yes, you can certainly find a company to pay you less than $100,000 to program computers for a living. That's not in dispute. But know that you (meaning you as well as anybody else anywhere in the US or the English speaking world) can also find a remote gig paying more than that.
Good developers are very valuable. Even in the sticks. Please don't sell yourself short.
Exactly HOW does one get $100,000 working remotely? When no-one's ever heard of you?
"Yeah just get a six figures remote job......... if you have tons of experience/large network/expert on a niche/top open source projects".
Employers appear to want you to be in at least a somewhat similar time zone as their core team and have some prior experience working remotely.
Take this hypothetical person living in the sticks. 3.5 years of experience doing local development. No prior remote experience -> not given the time of day by remote shops -> can't get remote experience.
True, though many people live on the coast specifically because of its tech industry. Sweeping that away is no better than pretending that it's the only game in town.