http://theexplanationproject.wikia.com/wiki/Directive_10-289
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shrugged:_Part_II
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/a/atlas-shrugged/summ...
http://theexplanationproject.wikia.com/wiki/Directive_10-289
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_Shrugged:_Part_II
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/a/atlas-shrugged/summ...
The book is poorly written and full of absurd Objectivist philosophy. I found Objectivism over the top even when I was a hardcore ancap libertarian.
Gross.
I don't believe you.
also, I don't care if you don't believe me. if you were really randian you would know that reality exists regardless of your belief in it, or to quote her quote of Socrates, "A is A."
I've also read and own literally every book she published, and a few published posthumously by leonard peikoff. I've considered her views extensively to see if they can coexist with mine.
Conclusion: gross.
Surprise: people read things that are hard/irritating to read when they're supposed to contain good lessons. Sometimes even more than once.
Case in point: the bible.
You're a waste of time anyway, later loser.
People have different opinions on Ayn Rand and Atlas Shrugged, even people who have read it. Deal with it.