It has small and consistent syntax coupled with pervasive immutability. I find that when I work with Clojure, I'm rarely thinking about the language itself.
Since the core language is very small, it's un-opinionated. This makes it easy to extend it in the way you need for your particular domain.
Many languages today have the same features and allow you to do everything Clojure does and more, however most of these languages are also far more complex.
I've come to realize that language complexity has a huge impact on productivity and code quality. It's incidental mental overhead that distracts you from the problem you're solving. The more syntax and rules you have the harder it becomes to tell whether the code is doing what you think it's doing.
I dabble in Elixir in my spare time, and that language appears to yield similar benefits. Again, immutability is the key, not necessarily the functional focus. While immutability is more difficult to implement in OO languages, I would be curious to see what that looks like.