These regressive legal immigration policies don't make USA great and show the spirit of America in good light. It feels as if, corporations and special interests like high skilled indentured workers hurting both americans and immigrants alike.
These regressive legal immigration policies don't make USA great and show the spirit of America in good light. It feels as if, corporations and special interests like high skilled indentured workers hurting both americans and immigrants alike.
At the same time the US tries to make it very easy for people to come for the short term - so that they can experience our way of life and maybe build some cultural bridges and mutual understanding.
The US isn't anti immgration for xenophobic reasons. Even very talented students are sent back to their countries, not because they couldn't contribute to the US and be great future citizens, but because it would be unethical for the government to do that on a large scale
Do you have a source?
I absolutely think that lots of these people would only be able to achieve their goals in America, and their home countries could not come close to what America can offer them. On top of that, the brain drain issue in other countries is not going to be solved, or even close to that, with the small number of people that get rejected h1b's each year. It honestly sounds out of place that we don't let people themselves decide what would give them the greatest happiness.
As a small side comment: What about people who are legitimately scared about going back to their country, because of conflict or their sexuality being unaccepted or the like? All of these people are in the same bucket currently, from what I understand. Is it greedy of America to offer them an opportunity here, or is it more important that we are giving them shelter away from their country?
I think the smartest people in a country can be very formative of that country's future. Doesn't take a lot of people to form whole industries.
I don't have a source for you, but that's how I'm understood the policy. How else can you explain that there are green card lotteries for random people in other countries while PhD students are sent home after they get their diplomas? (and I'm talking engineering students, not Art History PhDs... people that will clearly "pay off")
I understand your arguments, but they're individualistic and end up leaving the world a worse place. If there was some kind of global free movement of people the 3rd world would never develop. I mean in a sense even in the US you have a problem that a lot of places probably are loosing their top talent constantly - even if they have good schools and good local governance.. the ambitious ones probably don't stay in Alabama - they likely go to NYC or SF or Washington. The only equalizing force is that people want to stay close to family and close to their culture.