And there is no way around that - rules and laws are just words on paper, ultimately you always have to use force in one way or another if someone does not voluntarily honor the words, otherwise they will only be words on paper and nothing more.
There are certainly cases where you can punish someone without any cooperation on their side - like no longer giving them some benefits or freezing a bank account - but those scenarios are really far from covering all possible scenarios and you still have to determine the identity at the very least.
If you want to enforce a law (it's always an option not to enforce a given law, but then you might as well not have it) against an offender that for whatever doesn't want to cooperate with the penalty decided, what do you propose doing?
At this point, you often incur the additional criminal charge of 'resisting arrest', which can be penalized separately, which does not necessarily need to be by arresting you -- and thereby avoiding a race-condition. You could instead, for example, be subject to a court order that turns off utilities to your dwelling until you surrender to police custody, making you less likely to continue resisting. Or you could have your wages garnished, or simply staked out for days, making it difficult to go about your day. There are many creative possibilities.
But I do have a better idea. QUIT RESISTING ARREST. There you go. People in most other countries don't seem to have the problem with that we have in the US.
It's a tangent, but you also have to consider the self-employed survivalist on the ranch. No water to turn off, no employer to compel.