If this is indeed close to native performance, you wouldn't get anywhere close to that with a VM. I could be oblivious to some optimization techniques but Linux VM's on Windows have always performed drastically worse than native.
If this is indeed close to native performance, you wouldn't get anywhere close to that with a VM. I could be oblivious to some optimization techniques but Linux VM's on Windows have always performed drastically worse than native.
Now this does not render WSL useless; launch time for any random small tool is better with WSL than booting a complete VM, the memory is not partitioned, integration with the Windows Drive FS is slightly better, etc. But tons of use cases are better covered by a VM -- and with a huge margin.
Mate, the thing isn't even released yet and you're bashing it (excuse the pun) for taking too long to open up a man page? Give me a break.
After it's actually released and the performance gets better then it is of course going to trump running a whole VM and to suggest otherwise is just FUD, IMO.
I think Win10 is quite good, and that WSL is quite good given its age, and will be extremely useful for a lot of things.
Still, if you try some workloads, WSL is way slower than a Linux VM. I don't expect it to change for the release. I don't even expect it to change for the 2 years to come. Sill, of course, I could be wrong.
But even so; I insist: WSL is actually quite impressive.