Funny how the accepted narrative changes after someone dies.
Edit: Background: https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Aaron-Swartz-and-Steve-Huffman...
Very little to do with it except for writing the framework that scaled it to acquisition? Seems like a fairly important contribution to me.
I'm sorry if he was some kind of hero of yours that you have to emphasis some trivial contribution he made in the grand scheme of Reddit's success.
Edit: As far as I can see, the situation is almost exactly the same. Elon Musk's X.com and PayPal merged into PayPal. And Aaron's Infogami and reddit merged into reddit. The only difference I see is that the reddit founders don't like Aaron being a "cofounder". If they were both mergers, then I think it's fair to call both Elon and Aaron cofounders.
1) Reddit and Infogami merged into Not a Bug, not reddit.
2) Musk acted as a cofounder after the merge; Swartz did not. Swartz stuck around for a couple months post-merge then disappeared. So if you want to call him a "reddit cofounder", you can only do so in the loosest terms possible. He wasn't there for the founding and he didn't put in the work, but it says "cofounder" on the company papers.
Technically correct... The best kind of correct.
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/d2njs/til_th...
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+AlexisOhanian/posts/HJz9Vd58Wtb
Don't talk ill of the dead but my interactions with him were less than stellar. I think deep inside he had good intentions but the way he acted made me very angry and upset at times. My opinion on him changed later shortly before his death when he seemed more down to earth but that was years after I was almost mortal enemies with him.