But again, I'm not passing judgement on whether this particular killing was "justified" or not. I'm just saying we already know the whole story, and the whole story is bigger than this particular tragic ending.
But again, I'm not passing judgement on whether this particular killing was "justified" or not. I'm just saying we already know the whole story, and the whole story is bigger than this particular tragic ending.
It seems that we need a revolution on both sides for anything meaningful to happen. Sadly we probably won't see that happen anytime soon.
Hopefully we can at least pass some meaningful reform related to drug imprisonment which would keep a lot of people out of jail for petty things, which just ends up feeding the cycle to begin with.
What I will suggest is that overall violence does not seem to be correlated with the rate of police killings - see the third image in ref. 1.
[1] http://mappingpoliceviolence.org/2015
EDIT:
I can't reply to you due to the HN rate limit. Please see my response below:
I appreciate your response but I take issue with the data source behind that post (ref 1). I don't intend to take it apart fully, but it appeared to included factors (e.g., average commute time) that:
1. Systematically disfavor urban areas
2. Have little bearing to the question at hand, whether violence is correlated with police killings
Additionally, my claim above (2) is that violence and police killings, across the municipalities with the highest rates of police killings, are not correlated (ref. 3).
[1] http://places.findthehome.com/#guide
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12048043
[3] http://static1.squarespace.com/static/54ecf211e4b0ed744420c5...
http://kdvr.com/2015/05/08/by-the-numbers-here-are-the-most-...