Of course, my sample size is rather small; I'd love to see data supporting or rejecting my hunch.
Of course, my sample size is rather small; I'd love to see data supporting or rejecting my hunch.
If "religious" is equated to "superstitious" you can see just as many (educated) "superstitious" people in the USA as anywhere else. (google evangelical christianity. Not all of them are illiterate bumblers) You have "healing crusades" and prayer groups to overturn the Health Care Bill and so on in plenty.
What divides religious belief from superstition? Perhaps nothing.
1) People are more religious, even in the younger generation. (Having said that, it is important to note that religious != fundamentalist for most young, educated Indians. At least in my circles, religious folks will 'pay respects' to any place of worship they pass by including churches, mosques and temples of various types.)
2) Education in America involves a lot of critical thinking. In many classes you are specifically required to challenge an author, debate and you are encouraged to contradict the teacher. There is almost none of this in India. To me, this is something of a tragedy. I went to a small, secular school with excellent teachers (relatively speaking) and I can count on one hand the number of teachers who encouraged debate in class. It doesn't help that many 'good' schools in India are run by religious organizations like the Catholic church or religious trusts.
3) Until not too long ago, luck was a big factor in success in India. Opportunities were few and far between. When efforts are de-linked from rewards, I suspect many people start subscribing to superstitions.
Edit: I thought of one more reason: 'Respect for elders' really means 'disagreeing with elders is rude' in India. Put together with a much closer knit society, this means that your elders are going to chide you constantly for disagreeing with them, and pretty much going to take it as a personal insult. Suddenly it becomes very hard to develop independent beliefs. I was fairly lucky growing up in a family where we had all manner of debates, including on religion, but I believe that's pretty atypical.
My take on it : The level of chaos in India is extraordinary. It is ubiquitous: the traffic, the government, and the sheer number of people being the top three things that come to mind. On top of this, the justice system is defunct. In such a situation, prayer comes naturally. Faith and arbitrary belief are mechanisms to alleviate the stress and restore mental order, to lend a semblance of "reason" and rhyme to the working of a world that seems so arbitrary and cruel. They dull the mind but they act as an antidote against the external chaos.
I would guess that a sense of security and control over one's life and religiosity are anti-correlated, in any country. I would suspect that the poor, the indebted and the very ill are more likely to be religious.
The only difference between Indian and US superstitions is that US superstitions use scientific words rather than mystical words. "Evil spirits caused the tsunami" is no less superstition than "global warming caused the tsunami".
That is certainly sound science - certain wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation cause cancers. Why do you think people are advised to avoid prolonged exposure to sunlight (ultraviolet spectrum), or are given lead protection when receiving X-rays (x-ray spectrum)?
Your post is an excellent example on how superstition and ignorance spreads; when someone spouts nonsense and falsities with an air of incredulity. Please, if you do not know what you are talking about, do not speak on it.
Well.
When you think about it, global warming couldn't cause a tsunami, whereas evil spirits could potentially cause a tsunami (if they existed). They aren't equivalent statements.
So the first one is potentially true, but incredible, and the second is simply incorrect.
If your proposal is that evil spirits and global warming are equivalent beliefs, I don't think so. Global warming is actually testable (either the globe is warming or it isn't); you can't test for evil spirits. Global warming might be incorrect, and it might be supported by unfounded evidence, but it isn't superstitious.
For some westerners, global warming, chemicals and emf are mysterious and poorly understood forces which cause all sorts of bad things. This is the essence of superstition and mysticism.
My only problem is that the majority of beliefs that we rely on in a daily fashion become superstition, even though they could hypothetically not be.
Suppose I only superficially know how my car works, for example. Would a belief in my car be treated as a superstitious belief? (Lets say I believe it will get me to work). If not, where do we draw the line between 'magical' thinking and actual knowledge?
I have news for you: electromagnetic radiation causes cancer and is able to kill you and kill you fast. That it does is not questionable, the question is how much energy is needed to interfere with the human body. Again no superstition, just being cautious with the live of those you love.
Nobody knows what causes autism, so hypothesis could be done.
No, it's the placebo effect. If alternative medicine works better than placebo, it becomes medicine.
I have news for you: electromagnetic radiation causes cancer and is able to kill you and kill you fast. That it does is not questionable, the question is how much energy is needed to interfere with the human body. Again no superstition, just being cautious with the live of those you love.
Large amounts of any of the fundamental forces can kill you. Gravity can kill you. The strong nuclear force can definitely kill you. Even the weak nuclear force can kill you through beta radiation. Of course those forces are also necessary for life to exist.
You're also not discriminating between ionizing (cancer-causing) and non-ionizing radiation. The only ionizing radiation most people get is in the form of UV rays from the sun. Non-ionizing radiation (light, IR, microwaves, radio) is at power levels too low to harm us.
Nobody knows what causes autism, so hypothesis could be done.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say in the second half of that sentence, but it's incorrect to say "nobody knows what causes autism." The word autism probably refers to multiple conditions that we haven't differentiated yet. All of them involve changes in brain chemistry or brain structure. Some of these changes are caused by genes. Some are caused by environment. That is a much smaller region of hypothesis-space than "we don't know."
I think educated Indian suburban people do not subscribe to Superstition in the way of tantrik and babas but they do still hold havans and poojas before doing anything important. In india we still make a swastik (or any other holy symbol) over a new computer before starting it. And that too is turned on by the elder people of the family even if they are not going to use it ever.
I cant figure out if your agreeing with randomwalker or not :)
You generally won't find that kind of superstition practiced any more in the US/UK/Europe.
Although you do get a number of people either following a pseudo-science "guru" or one of the more cult-like modern religions.
Having an elder 'inaugurate' something is mostly a result of the "respect for elders" ethos in Indian society. This sounds pretty benign, and in many ways it is a good thing, but it has its downsides. I know people in my generation who couldn't (wouldn't) get married to someone unless their grandparents approved the person!