Hacker News Reader

Comment by tptacek | Hacker News Reader

Thanks for this detail; it's vivid and upsetting. One assumes that VAR pricing was at play here as well: not only did the government get sold a pointless super-computer, but the contractor made points on that sale.

View on HN

Exactly! The root of all this (I think) is the contracting structure for building jet fighters -- cost plus percentage -- was applied to software, which has such a different cost structure. With that structure there is no motivation to ship working software, or work efficiently at all. So people who value that won't work for any company that behaves like that, hence the shift of talent elsewhere.

God. I thought cost plus contracts were only used in exigent circumstances such as war, but apparently they are getting used more now, such as for the F-35.[1] Are software contracts really cost plus? These contracts shouldn’t be used for fighter jets or anything else. They should be banned except in critical situations and even then used sparingly. I remember stories about the boondoggle in Iraq, $20 coke cans and such.[2] Really sad if these are being used more now. Indicative of a lazy, corrupt government contracting process.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost-plus_contract

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_for_Sale:_The_War_Profite...

Na, this happens everywhere with software, startups too. The dev just wants to throw more resources at a problem than fix the complexity problems that make it inefficient. Perhaps it's a sign the dev is just out of their depth.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com