I think the publication regarding vulnerabilities in the kernel's handling of font rendering would make you think twice about this assertion. Windows certainly has its share of design flaws.
>That loser on Arch should talk when Linux and macOS are completely impenetrable.
Maybe try again next time without the personal attack. Also, I don't think that because the alternatives are imperfect Windows should be immune from criticism. Microsoft might have come a long way, but running Windows these days is still a security liability in ways that running Linux or macOS aren't. Windows is just a big juicy target and attackers go for the big fish.
Windows thug thinks his OS is secure when 99.9% of the viruses, malware and ransomware are all on Windows. There's a reason for this and it's not attributed to your ludicrous assumptions that these infections are all related to people visiting bad sites or downloading bad software - it's because Windows is an inherently badly designed OS that needs monthly patches to patch up all of its known holes.