Being an employee of a one of the largest online video providers, I can assure you that both we and our customers see multiple encoding formats as a big deal.
Being an employee of a one of the largest online video providers, I can assure you that both we and our customers see multiple encoding formats as a big deal.
If anything, Mozilla's stance towards H.264 is an attempt to avoid the web ending up in a similar situation it did with GIF, where the format was deeply entrenched before the companies controlling the licensing began asking users to pay license fees. The MPEG-LA's recent announcement that internet streaming would remain free until 2015 is a direct attempt to achieve further entrenchment of the format. There is a very real possibility that they will ask for licensing fees come 2015. And we have no idea how much they might cost. Even with free streaming, most of the people in the video production chain need to pay license fees to the MPEG-LA right now.
People could (and did) create uncompressed GIFs to avoid the patent risk. For obvious reasons, uncompressed H.264 is not useful.
The last GIF patents expired in 2006 (the first, in 2003 after the 1.0 version of the Mozilla App Suite)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_Interchange_Format#Uni...
what do you mean?