The source data is coming from research compiled by Rojstaczer and Healy [2].
---
[1]: http://pazymino1evolutionliteracy.blogs.umassd.edu/files/201...
[2]: http://rampages.us/profjhonn/wp-content/uploads/sites/111/20...
The source data is coming from research compiled by Rojstaczer and Healy [2].
---
[1]: http://pazymino1evolutionliteracy.blogs.umassd.edu/files/201...
[2]: http://rampages.us/profjhonn/wp-content/uploads/sites/111/20...
http://www.gradeinflation.com/figure8.png
and another interesting one in addition:
Regarding "knowledge inflation", I'm not sure that we see an inflation in knowledge per se (at least in a way that affects grade inflation in college courses), but I think what we do see is an increase in 1) quantitative methods, and 2) cross-talk between fields. This influences the subject matter people in a variety of fields are expected to know (e.g., the amount of math, comp. sci., stats, etc...) , and thus, I suppose, inflates the expected knowledge in this sense.
Anecdata: I teach calculus 1, and guess how many math majors are enrolled? Zero. It's mostly bio, and other sciencey fields. This affects how I teach (and grade!) calculus. I'm willing to bet other courses -- like intro programming, intro stats, etc... -- experience something similar. Is this an explanatory factor for grade inflation? I don't know. There's obviously a huge number of things to consider.