I'm getting to the point where I just don't believe in the concept of requiring particular employees to be quickly reachable 24/7, even for limited periods of time. I know there are business realities that occasionally make this impossible (especially for new, small companies, or larger companies unwilling to properly staff their technical departments), but it's an unsustainable practice, and I believe we as technical staff owe it to ourselves to oppose it and find something better.
(And for the record, yes, my company does have on-call rotations, but I do everything in my power to make myself redundant and unnecessary even when I am on-call.)
I still don't understand how so many businesses simply ignore this problem. The network is assumed far too often to be reliable and ubiquitous, even among people who have years of experience with radio dead zones, oversubscription, and the numerous other ways networks fail.
> reachable 24/7
While 24/7 (or other excessively long periods of time) should simply be banned for basic health and safety reasons, I do understand that on-call time is unavoidable for some businesses. The catch is that any on-call time needs to be paid. How much payment is open to negotiation, but if you are expected to restrict your life such that you can be called in for overtime, then some amount of compensation is required.
If this seems impossible due to being paid a salary instead of wages, overtime limitations/restrictions, or similar nonsense... that's what unions are for.
Personally, I think the company founder made a good point when he said that people should be able to let loose without fear of becoming social media clowns. We bang on about open standards, privacy being violated and 'freedom', and here we are moderating the behavior of all around to our own detriment.
If you buy a ticket you also agree to the terms and conditions, if you don't like it, don't go to the event. Is that not how this works? People keep telling me so.