That could be a communication problem between card terminal and network, not representing the average case.
This is not possible via the chip which requires synchronous communication with the terminal.
The example it brought up was that because the chip's identity could be verified through local communication with the chip, purchases could be logged at the terminal and synchronized at any point with the payment processor.
Is there something about the US payment processing market that makes that feature unattractive? Are businesses subsidizing more fraud protection than in other countries by making transactions synchronous and hiring more staff?