Berkshire Hathaway's net income last year alone was 24 billion USD. I don't think you would be able to generate this income no matter when you invested in Bitcoin, to say nothing of matching it in a single year.
I get that you are talking about the return on investment as a percentage of stake, but the scale we are talking about, as well as the difference in risk profile, means you are very nearly comparing apples and oranges. I can point out any number of various schemes which have gotten people rich over the years - that doesn't make them sound investments.
Same thing if you had invested in the winning lottery numbers. Just because something paid off once doesn't mean it will continue to pay off. Especially when you are talking about bubbles/ponzi-schemes.
I have some penny stocks to sell you...
You weren't hanging around the right IRC channels the day after MtGox went under, I take it.
Regarding the returns, I will refer you to our old friend Keynes. "Markets can remain irrational a lot longer than you and I can remain solvent." Cryptocurrencies and related technologies have potential, but I have seen little evidence to suggest that current prices aren't completely irrational.
https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Gen/Tax-treatment-of-crypto-c...
It's a system of independent probabilities, hence gambler's fallacy.
People who get in on a ponzi or bubble in the early days tend to do well, yes. Plenty of folks picked up BTC when they were $1k+, though.