So yes, the CBFC did probably do what they did under political pressure but the politicians don't control everything in the end.
The fact that politicians can even take this step for censorship demonstrates a weakness in the freedom of speech that citizens of India have.
Source : http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/udt...
And A/C is a ridiculous idea: if Benegal actually proposed this I think I've lost a great deal of respect for him. "Only to be screened in red-light areas". Ridiculous.
Indians don't have freedom of speech and right to property. Ironically first amendment to Indian constitution made the "right to speech" subservient to law. For example: You are free to say whatever you want as long as it is not violating some existing law.
The solution here is that the common Indians need to learn a thing or two about what liberty means and recognize that the current constitution and law they are using to govern are exactly same as the British colonial masters.
Since the liberalization in 1991, which basically increased economic freedom only a little bit has resulted into phenomenal growth. I only wish India could liberalize more and get more liberty protecting laws.
"Ram-leela" was pressured to change its title, to get an U/A rating eventually. A too modern interpretation of their sacred Hindu mythos. "Kaum de Heere" was too positive about the Indira Gandhi assassination. "Madras Cafe" got an U/A. About the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. "Shahid" got an A. A biopic on a human rights activist and advocate, with no violent scenes. "Dil Se" got an A. One of the classics of indian political movies.
All can be recommended.