was the work of Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers part of the 60 studies you analyzed? they give pretty compelling evidence that the Easterlin paradox is not well-founded [0]. this seems to contradict your points claiming that money != happiness.
Money does make you a bit happier, but most readers of HN are among the top 5% of income earners in the world, so it's not the top priority for them, on the margin. You can get more mileage by focussing on other things. I also think affective measures of welfare are more reliable than evaluative ones. But it's a huge issue that I had to write many thousands of words to cover properly, so check out the full article and see what you think.