Turns out I was spot on: a bit of googling revealed he was.
Turns out I was spot on: a bit of googling revealed he was.
For instance, for the last 4-5 years in our computational science research group, we have been sitting pretty steadily near 50%.
Hypothesis is that left-handedness can be caused by early brain trauma, so if "lefties" are disproportionately represented in such positions, the ones with non-pathological causes would seem to have an even bigger advantage over the right-handed to make up for the lower mean. Or perhaps it's associated with other talents that make up for the deficits. (Edit: Wikipedia seems to support this - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handedness#Intelligence)
Or perhaps the research conclusions are just wrong.
If true (in a less extreme sense), I imagine it would be vaguely correlated with post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic growth. Some of the most amazing people humanity has produced went through unimaginable suffering. And yet the vast majority of people who go through hideous suffering end up dysfunctional.
So it's something like– most people with a disadvantage get messed up, but the few who manage to overcome it, manage to overcompensate dramatically.
Yep... you can have distributions with identical means, and fatter tails.
Most left-handed people I know have a mixture of left/right-handedness, whereas it seems all the right-handed people are right all the way.
I use my left for lots of things.
Oddly, learning ukulele currently I noticed that left hand is what hits the frets... which is way more dexterous work than strumming.