Esperanto and other conlangs are more an extreme case, but there's surprisingly little that's "natural" about the "natural" languages either.
Esperanto and other conlangs are more an extreme case, but there's surprisingly little that's "natural" about the "natural" languages either.
The drive for unification in Italy was big in 1800. The language a unified Italy would speak was decided long before because poets and writers already standardized on one of the language of Tuscany, the one of Florence. That was the "standard Italian" since 1200. Not that many people spoke it. Everybody spoke the language of it's area, sometimes not. All those languages derived from Latin but people could not easily understand each other, especially over long distances (even 30 km.) Only priests and literates had lingua francas, Latin and standard Italian.
Some samples from famous authors:
Ariosto, 1500, can be read quite easily nowadays [1]
Petrarca, 1300, is a little more difficult and it takes a little to get accustomed with. [2]
Dante, 1200, is also difficult sometimes but high school students read it with little help. [3]
[1] http://www.orlandofurioso.com/testo-completo-dei-canti/1706/...
Dante is usually credited for having chosen the Tuscany/Florence dialect to be the future Italian, later adopted by many writers and poets (that also contributed to the evolution of the language), so yes, I wouldn't say it is artificial at all, maybe the only artificial thing is the choice of a dialect over another.
And as I guess many already know many of the regional dialects survived, and in some regions more than others are still spoken. In fact an Italian is often bilingual in a sense. And if you happen to be in a book store in Italy it is not at all that rare to find a book from a contemporary author written in his local dialect.
BTW we study all of the three authors you mentioned at school ... not an easy task I assure you :P
Simplified Characters are another example. A lot of the simplifications had been around for a very long time, so they existed as part of a natural language, but saying, X is traditional, Y is simplified, and standardizing the simplified version, is fundamentally the act of language construction. [The lack of such a deep history is probably why https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_round_of_simplified_Chi... never caught on.]
Both are constructed, and not just bits and pieces, though they were constructed from "natural" elements.
Bokmål came into being through a series of drastic reforms of a combination of Danish (which was the administrative language until the dissolution of the union with Denmark in 1814) and urban Norwegian dialects, which were heavily influenced by Danish.
The reforms were aimed at removing a lot of the Danish influence, and continued well into the 20th century (well, in a sense they are still continuing, though making Bokmål less Danish is no longer an explicit goal). Many of the changes took decades to take root as most adults didn't really change but school children were taught and graded on the new forms.
E.g. the change from Danish word-order in numbers ("fireogtyve" - 24 - "fire-og-tyve = four and twenty") to uniformity with less formal spoken Norwegian dialects ("tjuefire" - "twentyfour") is one that was still for all intents ongoing at least well into the 80's (you'll still find older people using the old forms today) despite being introduced by a language reform in 1951. My parents learned the new form in primary school in the late 50's yet still regularly reverted to the old form around me while I was growing up in 70's and 80's, and as a result I used to switch back and forth between the two at least into my 20s (in the 90's)
(Incidentally these reforms also means that for Norwegians learning German, spending some time reading old Norwegian books is highly helpful to get used to German word order and even recognizing vocabulary, as the reforms that moved Bokmål away from Danish also moved it further away from German)
Nynorsk, meanwhile, was explicitly created as a form of unification of a number of very different rural Norwegian dialects. This included synthesising a grammar, creating a bunch of new words that tried to find forms that were "close enough" to the widest possible range of dialects, and combining a lot of other elements from different dialects.
Bokmål is used as the written language of the vast majority, despite most spoken dialects probably in many ways being closer to Nynorsk (though more so in some parts of the country than others - Norwegian dialects are extremely varied). In some parts Bokmål - particularly spoken Bokmål - has a tendency to be seen as more refined, as a remnant of their historical origins. An unofficial dialect - Riksmål - is basically Bokmål sans a number of the reforms, and remains much closer to Danish. It sees very little use, though well into the 80's one of the largest conservative newspapers stuck to a lot of the Riksmål forms.
Bokmål and Nynorsk are mutually intelligible, and successive language reforms over more than a century have aimed to bring them closer (largely by creating optional forms of many words that are consider valid in both languages), but having to learn both is a frequent cause of discontent at Norwegian schools (it annoyed me immensely, because unlike most Norwegians I speak very close to pure Bokmål, and a relatively conservative form of it, as a legacy of my dads upbringing and reading a lot of old books growing up, which made Nynorsk harder)
While the reforms do take into account natural language shifts to some extent, large parts of the current modern structure of both languages was effectively created by academics.
Maybe I'm just an idiot, but I contest this :) I have an easier time understanding spoken Swedish (and written Danish) than Nynorsk. I think unless you grew up in an area with a dialect very similar to it, or had it drilled into your head in school, it's basically a foreign language.
Context: I speak Bøkmål and Trøndersk (for you non-Norwegians, that's the regional dialect in the greater Trondheim area), and was raised primarily abroad, though we primarily spoke Norwegian at home.
Trøndelag used to be a Nynorsk core area, by the way. Around 1940, half the population there used Nynorsk.