Hacker News Reader

The thing with IGs (inspector generals) though is that they are also like HR--they serve to protect the government as an entity rather than the agents, just like HR serves the company, not the employee.

View on HN

Agreed, though, I'd say they act like that because they answer to the higher ups in the organisations they're apart of, and aren't properly independent. Thus there is no self-interested incentive to take the rank-and-file's side. I'm not sure why HR or IGs are ever assigned the task of 'representing' agents in the first place; it just seems like a conflict of interest.

Also, the plural of inspector general is inspectors general, not inspector generals.

I wonder if an independent board could eliminate this conflict of interest. We have a so-called independent system setup for lots of local policing agencies, yet they often coverup the misdeeds of the police rather than protecting the citizenry.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com