Hacker News Reader

Comment by jordigh | Hacker News Reader

That's not the same thing as a metahistory. It doesn't tell you which commit(s) replaces with commit(s). Mercurial Evolve, for example, will record if a commit was split into several commits or if a commit was folded (squashed) into a single commit. Thus you can trace the history of a commit as it, well, evolves. You can't easily do this with git reflog, because it doesn't store that information.

View on HN

> because it doesn't store that information

Is there something about the Hg architecture that makes it easier to plug in something like Evolve than with Git? Evolve isn't enabled out of the box on Mercurial either.

All of the actual infrastructure for evolve is actually in hg core. This is the obsolescence markers and the logic for hiding obsolete commits. This infrastructure makes it so that all hg commands see a filtered set of commits if any are obsolete and "unreferenced" (hg doesn't really find commits by referencing, but the logic for when an obsolete commit is hidden is similar to git's referencing logic).

The "only" thing the Evolve extension does is expose a UI for creating and manipulating obsolete commits, but it's not the only extension that does it.

So, I guess you could build Evolve for git, if you absolutely cannot be persuaded to use anything but git. You would need to build obsolescence markers, and the proper logic for exchanging them between clones. Getting this right has taken a lot of work for hg, but maybe now that the ideas are mostly there, it would be easy to replicate them.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com