Edit: as pointed out by comments below, East Liberty.
Edit: as pointed out by comments below, East Liberty.
Bigotry based on racial, subcultural, and socioeconomic markers? I was born in Pittsburgh and I grew up in that part of the country. All manner of people fit those racial, subcultural, and socioeconomic markers -- good and bad.
As a non-white myself, let me just say this: Most of the time, most people are basically good. However, if you stand out from the crowd, even for reasons you can't help, that small single-percentage of jerks and sociopaths is going to spot you and pay some unwanted attention to you.
The above is contingent on group-think or mob psychology not having taken sway, of course. Those factors change the situation completely.
That said... the extreme whiteness and slight red-necky feel of non-East End neighborhoods.
...is definitely still an issue. It's getting better though, and for the most part anywhere within the city limits is relatively diverse. Pittsburgh's biggest problem is that the segregation is by neighborhood. It's comparable to Chicago, in many ways.
Hey shas3, this is serious question, which I'm asking purely out of curiosity. I'm not judging you or trying to embarrass you. Would you consider it okay if a white person were say, for example, about Detroit, "as a white, I was sometimes bothered by the extreme blackness and slight ghetto feel of many Detroit neighborhoods."