Its okay, everyone believes what you do. That doesn't limit the US in any way from creating court orders against non-US persons located outside of the US, it doesn't limit them from extraditing them, raiding their property, hacking and altering their property, and convicting them in US courts and jailing them, and winning appeals.

Typically regarding raids and property seizures they collaborate with local authorities in foreign countries, with one FBI agent present to make sure the raid is compliant with US laws.

Sometimes such compliance violates the local laws, and merely delays extradition proceedings. But the US typically gets the result it wants by freezing the property and preventing the person from continuing their behavior, and if they get the person to the US for jail and trial that is just icing on the cake.

> No US law applies outside the US

"no" is a bit strong there.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-fede...

> Federal law provides “extraterritorial jurisdiction” over certain sex offenses against children. Extraterritorial jurisdiction is the legal authority of the United States to prosecute criminal conduct that took place outside its borders.

They typically don't because there are consequences for the US if it tried. It is all the other countries where they do enforce it.

Its okay, everyone believes what you believe, this isn't reality though.

In the 1990s, the FBI and NSA did a lot of good work persuing organized computer crime operations around the world. Back then they also seemed to care more about the security of US infrastructure.

they do.

although the FBI is a domestic enforcement agency, Congress specifically gave it the ability to hack any computer anywhere in the world.

Despite whatever concepts you have ever heard about any agency's mission or limitations, Congress has the ability to delegate tasks to whatever agency it thinks have resources, and then those laws stay on the books.