when the individual becomes so important that community suffers we have our priorities wrong.
when the individual becomes so important that community suffers we have our priorities wrong.
For at at least some of the cases discussed in the article, there is nothing minority about it at all. For example, the social pressure to disallow children's independence is by far the majority position now, as far as I can see. The "free range kids" folks and similar represent a minority that gets a lot of social disapprobation for wanting their kids to have the same sort of freedoms that were common place 25 years ago. Vague and unsupported concerns about "safety" are usually hand waved about.
What you say may be in play for some of these issues, but I suspect it is far too blunt a tool to truly explain much of it.
What are you talking about specifically?
Homosexuals and transgendered people are still too 'bleeding' edge to be classified as a 'protected' class. Give it 10 years and they likely will be.