Or Python, or Ada, or Ruby, or Go, or Java, or Lisp, or any of the myriad of other memory safe programming languages.
When it comes to memory safe languages, your choices do not boil down to "Rust or nothing".
When it comes to memory safe languages, your choices do not boil down to "Rust or nothing".
Of course, Mercurial gives lie to this assumption.
What it matters is if it is fast enough for the use case being targeted.
As side note I remember when C compilers for home computers generated worser code than junior Assembly programmers.
It takes a lot more than a toolchain to write fast code.
Even then, Mercurial is implemented in Python and quite usable
The fact that a Java rewrite of git actually exists demonstrates the falsity of this statement.