That Emoji Does Not Mean What You Think It Means
gizmodo.com
gizmodo.com
> about half of the characters used on Instagram are emoji ( http://gizmodo.com/emojis-are-becoming-the-dominant-language... )
but the linked article says:
> As of March 2015, nearly half of all text-based communications over Instagram contained emoji.
That's a huge difference in meaning.
http://grouplens.org/site-content/uploads/Emoji_Interpretati...
Whoops.
What's really interesting about that is that it seems like a really unlikely mistake to make. Grins bend the corners of the mouth upward, yes? Surely not many people would say no? At least in the cartoon language of emoji, I would have expected that to be universally agreed upon.
That suggests to me a common cause rather than independent error. Was it a mistake that propagated through copying? Did one initial mistake become established through usage as meaning something different from the specs? Something else?
It would be interesting to know the lineage of these faces and to understand where the mistake was initially made, and if perhaps it was perpetuated intentionally. None of the other emoji have misconstrual measurements anywhere close to that one, which suggests a story.
Besides, we've had smileys for ages as well. ^_^, :), :-P, D:, :-E (bucktoothed vampire), etc. have all been around for a while and predate emoji, which just give us a single character representation (and a variety, several types of smiles and frowns and sweating and crying that can be used for different things).