I would personally have elected not to use it in this case given the wide audience, but I understand that the context was not hateful and it was being used to illuminate a real situation and promote discussion. Just my opinion, not a permission slip obviously.
I said the word non-chalantly to my girlfriend in a sentence the other day (to see what her reaction would be), and she nearly fell out of her chair. We're both white. The word is, and I think will always be, extremely powerful.
> it was used just about every time a Black person was whipped, chained, beaten, insulted, spat upon, raped, lynched, or otherwise humiliated and mistreated by White folks.
Since everyone would know what term was being used anyway, why NOT censor it, given it's vile origins? Why continue to say it?
I appreciate it when people don't nerf their language, personally. It's just more honest.
There is a vast difference between the word rape and the N word.
Good question. What is the cost that you're talking about?
Speech has intent behind it. Peatmoss' comment doesn't seem intended to hurt anyone. It seems intended to drive home the unfairness that they (peatmoss) witnessed, and to remind us that racism is still a widespread problem. I don't think that a bowdlerized version of the comment would've had the same impact.
There's a vast difference between using a racial slur yourself and calling out someone who does.
And why do you think white people look for excuses to use the word? I haven't heard a White person use it since middle school.