But Nature Scientific Reports is junk compared to Nature. It's not actually a junk journal, but it's a huge step below Nature or Science. It's an open access journal that charges $$$ and explicitly only reviews papers for technical validity (e.g. making sure you made no errors). It does not judge papers based on whether they are interesting, impactful, useful, or whether papers actually make a meaningful contribution to the field.

The hard part about research isn't getting something technically correct. It's about getting something meaningful that advances the field.