This comment convinced me to flag the post, similar to the way I try to flag all posts with headlines that misinterpret or misstate scientific findings. We shouldn't reward authors who choose to twist facts in order to get clicks.
My gripe is with clicking on something that isn't what it says it is, not with whether or not the original survey was written up in a flawed way.
When really, it's just that they answered this particular online poll on this website popular in the USA.
"JavaScript, the most poorly documented language on earth." Because, well, it probably is. You don't go to a central JavaScript reference guide, you google for stuff. Or maybe you're unemployed and have time to answer polls on websites.
I do agree that this survey is not at all representative, which is why I decided to flag OP.