> Linux without a terminal wouldn't be Linux
Linux without a terminal wouldn't be GNU/Linux.
Linux without a terminal wouldn't be GNU/Linux.
Linux without a terminal wouldn't be Python Foundation/Perl Foundation/SQLite/Xorg/OpenBSD Foundation/RedHat/GNU/Linux. GNU tools are only a few of many components of a Linux kernel-based operating system that people use every day. There are a myriad of entities that produce code that makes up a modern Linux system, not to mention the many Linux systems out there that don't use a GNU userland. Insisting on GNU/Linux is just petty and silly.
Wasn't it the point to recognize that without GNU there would have been no Linux in the first place?