This is such a sophomoric approach to ethics it hardly deserves a response. Animals are not humans. They are hardly likely to have the same capacity to suffer. Anthropomorphizing them is not a credible way to talk about the issue. At best they ought to be compared to a severely mentally disabled human. Still deserving of dignity, but hardly treated as equal.
> At best they ought to be compared to a severely mentally disabled human. Still deserving of dignity, but hardly treated as equal.
Is it OK to eat severely mentally disabled humans, if we do so "humanely?"