Hacker News Reader

Comment by alyandon | Hacker News Reader

That's a really unfortunate experience upgrade experience. My experiences after upgrading multiple machines has been flawless so far - even on an old Dell Vostro 1500 laptop.

View on HN

Your better experience is not an excuse for Microsoft pushing already rejected "Get Windows 10" code every month anew to my machine where I already tried the upgrade and it doesn't work and I've rejected. They override my rejection every month!

And also not an excuse for not fixing the svchost problem:

(updates got immensely slower around the time since the "Get Windows 10 "updates started to appear)

http://www.sevenforums.com/performance-maintenance/392938-sv...

And for not allowing users to control the updates in Windows 10:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Windows10/comments/49wcua/svchostex...

I just find it interesting that over a wide range of random hardware that Windows 10 appears to have not been a problematic upgrade for me and this is speaking as a power user that has oddball software/hardware configurations.

Also, my statement wasn't meant to imply that a good upgrade experience was an excuse for Microsoft's behavior in regards to the constant "upgrade now" nagging or ignoring issues that impact its customers.

I guess your "random hardware" was still not random enough: My notebook that goes crazy after the upgrade is certainly not an "oddball" as it has

the Intel processor,

the Intel chipset,

the Intel graphics card,

the Intel WiFi card, most expensive of that times,

the maximum amount of memory for the CPU and chipset (4 GB) and

the most expensive Windows 7 version installed.

I'd even say it can't be more straightforward than that. And what's worse, the Windows 10 Upgrade program "tested" the configuration and claimed "everything will be fine." Now it nags even after I reverted to Windows 7. Windows 7 has no problems, Windows 10 has problem with interrupts handling.

And the Windows 7 "hours long" update problem is surely known to Microsoft, I've diagnosed it on my machine too, this function:

    wuaueng.dll!CUpdatesToPruneList::AddSupersedenceInfoIfNeeded

appears to still (after the 2016 March update of the Update Client (7.6.7601.19161) and KB3102810 installed) be called almost infinite number of times. I guess it's some unnecessary recursion on an O(N to a high power) loop which was tolerable for small number of existing files in the list of all updates, and now explodes. Microsoft appears to avoid fixing that code even if it's quite obvious for anybody who knows to interpret the stack.

Yes, that does seem like a pretty straightforward hardware configuration and I've certainly felt similar pains in the past. For a period of several months Windows 8/8.1 on my laptop refused to download and install updates due to some persistent error coming from Microsoft's WU infrastructure. There was page after page of people complaining about the issue on Microsoft's public forums without even an acknowledgment from Microsoft that the issue existed.

In desperation, I ended up running WSUS inside a VM and pointing my laptop at that VM in order to get updates installed. :-/

Reply on news.ycombinator.com