I would say that specifying that warming 1860-1880 'not statistically significantly different' to 1995-2009 is quite an admission. Not the same as "No global warming" but not exactly evidence of runaway AGW.
That's as opposed to modern data, which is much better. It's also opposed to other lines of evidence, such as atmospheric CO2 content. It's also opposed to physical evidence like the EIS data.
Have you watched the EIS time lapse videos? Go there and watch: http://www.extremeicesurvey.org/ It's both beautiful and powerful stuff.