If we are to use this [0] definition, then "Hypergrowth at" can be omitted. It seems like a better title would include "in highly regulated industries."
It's interesting to note that the essay only includes discussion of law as it relates to defending startups from incumbents, not as a caveat to the advice: "The good news is, if you get growth, everything else tends to fall into place." Is it the case that Zenefits merely failed to grow fast enough to present a more credible threat to state prosecutors?