It's everyone else who is making a big deal out of him leaving Twitter, which (again) kind of proves his original point. Stephen Fry leaves Twitter. Well, so fucking what.
It's everyone else who is making a big deal out of him leaving Twitter, which (again) kind of proves his original point. Stephen Fry leaves Twitter. Well, so fucking what.
> “Now the pool is stagnant, …frothy with scum.” Fry’s feelings aren’t feelings — they are a universal and objective standard of behavior, which everyone else is violating.
When he says "stagnant, frothy with scum" I don't interpret that as him complaining about his feelings, but rather that the discussion/communication (which, I guess, is the ultimate purpose of any communication medium) has become impossible, precisely because people keep being offended and complaining about their feelings.
In short: He says Fry is trying to claim his subjective views as objective facts.
There are no objective facts to be had regarding the state of Twitter. This is not physics or mathematics. The state of twitter is entirely subjective. How is Fry ever denying this?
"uses the vocabulary of someone describing immutable and unarguable facts".. What does that even mean? It's using the vocabulary of Stephen Fry talking about this thing that annoyed him and how distancing himself from it made him feel better. It is entirely about his feelings.
So you mean he's not offended --- rather, the other people violated some universal standard of behavior?
That this post tries to frame Fry's post as some kind of veiled offense and then smugly points out the inconsistency in that, is quite insulting in my eyes. Even if it were accurate about Fry's message, it would still be immensely rude to me to belittle another person like that.
So he wasn't offended, he just had his feelings hurt?
[1]: http://www.svt.se/kultur/film/stephen-fry-lamnar-twitter
It's the commentary about the platform and the people using it. Sure it's not exactly 9/11 but it's not THAT bizarre that someone picked it up.
You have to be careful. Some of the people who complain about others being offended all the time are the biggest babies.
[Edit] If he is leaving bc it is no fun anymore that is an excellent reason.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/08/richard...
It's one of those comments that was so obviously stupid and pointless, its difficult to know where to start in responding to it.
When I clicked this link I (genuinely) had to check the date, because Fry has been flouncing from Twitter for years.
And yes, flouncing is the word. Fry could quite easily stop using Twitter if he wanted to. He could just stop using it.
Instead he, not "everyone else", writes a lengthy post about the event on his website, perhaps for anyone who missed his leaving Twitter announcement of 2014, or his 2009 announcement about leaving Twitter.
That he has quit Twitter before makes it even more of a non-event, if possible.
We have a saying in Portugal: "Quem está mal que se mude" that can be roughly translated to "Who doesn't feel well [here] should/can move". It mean that anyone who is unconfortable here isn't obliged to stay here and is free to go anywhere else.
That's what Fry did. He is not happy with/in Twitter, so he went away. His "‘I am offended by that.’ Well, so fucking what." remark remains sound.