My Dad loves FB; he's kind of the family stalker now where no picture or comment goes unnoticed! He really wanted to use Twitter but has given up after multiple failed attempts. I think that's their problem in a nutshell. He so wanted it to work.
My Dad loves FB; he's kind of the family stalker now where no picture or comment goes unnoticed! He really wanted to use Twitter but has given up after multiple failed attempts. I think that's their problem in a nutshell. He so wanted it to work.
Facebook on the other hand, is full of interesting news from people I love. Technology has come a long way when I get more accurate news from my mums friends than I do from the local TV news station. Our village had floods and the local pumping station failed, Facebook friends (and shared posts) kept us all in the loop and organised sands bags, pumps and help for the elderly.
Though, I realize that chronological tweet order is important to the core user-base.
Maybe not every tweet is as important as all the others. Maybe I want to follow a lot of interesting people, but not necessarily see every tweet about how much they like the hotel breakfast, or whether the conference provided a good enough AV system, or how good the broadband is in various SF neighborhoods.
Is it maybe that you haven't followed anyone yet, and twitter is showing you miscellaneous junk because they're too daft to show you a "hey you should search for some people you're interested in" dialog?
Personally i find that if you care for higher snr, curating blogs and newsletters works better.
Besides that , twitter is sometimes nice for conversations. But not so much as to be worth the hassle of using it.
If you want to have a good experience on Twitter, here are my suggestions:
- Keep the number of people you follow under 1,000. I follow about 600. Any more than 1,000 and it starts to become information overload.
- Keep the quality of the people you follow exceptionally high. Look through their recent Tweets and see if they post content you're interested in before following.
- Unfollow accounts that add to the noise. Don't want to see every TechCrunch article? Unfollow them. One thing I've discovered is that individual journalists are much more interesting than following publications wholesale.
1) Follow interesting people in the tech industry to see what they are thinking about semi-real time. I often see links on Twitter days or weeks before they end up on HN for example.
2) Add to the entertainment experience of TV. Watching The Walking Dead, the Super Bowl, or the debates with Twitter going in the background provides insight and comedic relief.
3) Publicly shaming companies. I've done this multiple times with Comcast and they have reached out and made it right.
What I don't do is follow friends or people I know well for the most part. I already know what they think, so a stream of their thoughts does not provide much value.
Someone posted a "show a completely random tweet" page the last time this came up, and I noticed that few of the ones I saw were in English and quite a few in Arabic.
Twitter isn't the best tool for family-and-friends; Facebook has that use case covered. But trying to turn Twitter into FB will destroy its usefulness for all the people who want it because it's not like FB. Twitter is best for the question "what's going on in the world now?"
To be honest, I also didn't really understand twitter until I had to sign up for it to promote a talk I was giving at a conference. Then after playing around with it a bit, I found some interesting people I ended up following. Before that though I didn't really see the appeal. And this is coming from a tech and news junkie.
Twitter should be led by someone who is strong in PR. PR is where Twitter has excelled most. I believe neither Jack Dorsey nor Dick Costolo are even known outside of the tech industry, how can they manage a PR product if people barely knows them? Even Scooble would be a better fit than Jack Dorsey. If I were Twitter I'd put in charge some well known public figure with connections in the media and movies industries.
If I were Twitter I would poach Amazon executives and make them flog the company into shape: lean, dogfooding, pushing out services to the tech community, and letting new paradigms emerge before co-opting them.
I believe Twitter could succeed as a PR company but will probably fail as a tech company.
Also, I am not convinced Twitter has to be liked by everybody. No product has to be liked by everybody.
Anti-dogfooding!
I don't use twitter and I'm not looking for a new job, but it seems like an interesting enough place to work.
Twitter is besieged by directly contradictory demands: "Make it easier for everyone to use!" vs "Don't kill the things that make it unique and useful!"
I'd be reassured about algorithmic timelines if Twitter's attempts were not so terrible.
A year ago I started following Bob (an Internet famous personality.) Bob has made one post to twitter, and I've forgotten that I'm following him. Until one day Twitter puts a post from Ann - a friend of Bob that Bob follows - into my timeline. Ann and Bob post exclusively about eg Minecraft. I post and read exclusively about mental health treatment and stigma in the UK. I immediately unfollow Bob (because he never posts anything and I'm not interested in anything people he follows posts) and I dismiss the post and say that I didn't like it.
And Twitter will do this week after week after week. It'll post something to my timeline that my twitter account is clearly not interested in. (High end bicycles; alcohol ads; cars; etc etc).
I wouldn't mind if it was purely random - "hey, we're going to show you random shit and maybe you'll like some of it" is better than "hey, we think we know what you're interested in. We've spent time and money developing these algorithms. How about Pianos? Cod fishing? Teaspoons?"
If/when Twitter launches an algorithmic timeline, it is probably going to suck at first. Only by measuring huge volumes of user interaction with the feature, will they get enough data to make it work well.
I mean, look at this thread--people are praising Facebook's ease of use, but back when Facebook starting filtering their timelines, a) power users were super pissed, and b) a lot of random stuff showed up. For a long time there was a semi-hidden "show me all posts" option for the timeline, which power users turned on. That doesn't exist anymore, and most people don't miss it, because the filtering is good enough now.
There's not really one algorithm. There's a learning system that creates, on the fly, a billion custom algorithms--one per user.
Learning systems need two things to work well. They need a huge corpus of data, and they need clear guidance on the desired outcome. Twitter has a lot of tweets, but they won't really have clear guidance until people start actually using the feature.
I'm sure they're trying to collect some now, with their "while you were away" feature, and tracking interactions like you unfollowing Bob after seeing that tweet from Ann.
Disclaimer: I've never been an active Twitter user and am probably too anti-social for my own good.