I don't get it. The article does not point out even an attempt to ask the leaders of the said corporations - "Why?".
Its better to ask to get some semblance of their thinking instead of pure speculation.
Its better to ask to get some semblance of their thinking instead of pure speculation.
And I would rather read an article that use ratios between liquid/static moneys those corporations got instead of random values.
(I'm one of those that believes static money has no value, had and/or may have, but in reality it's absolute zero).