I feel like everyone is inadvertently proving PG right (even though I think he's kinda wrong). His whole point is that "inequality" is too vague and broad of a term, and that we should speak specifically to things like poverty and tax evasion.
i.e.
> Some of that is certainly Silicon Valley executives. But it's the financial professionals that this conversation is really about. ... The inequality debate is driven by the belief that those kinds of abuses are disparate and widespread.
But I don't think most people understand "Occupy Wall Street" as being distinguishable from the Google protests, as Ezra suggests. Most people aren't highly specific about the difference between Uber's valuation and Subprime Mortgage Lending (including the media).