I didn't even notice that it was split into two pages.

I also appreciated that they left out the detail on what the intended purpose for Les 1 and Les 2 was, so they wouldn't confuse anyone with too much information.

http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/les-1.htm

I also appreciated the fact that they overrode the browser's default scrolling to a less natural speed, and in doing so, also prevented me from being able to use gestures to return to hacker news.

Yes, I often I judge the journalistic source by the links to other articles. Here, I judge that the source is very interested in the word "dirty". That makes a ham radio article all the more .. unexpected.

lol, but then I realized.. maybe it's done on purpose to validate an article's appeal.