Hacker News Reader

You clearly have not been following the entire story. Selective facts don't tell the entire narrative.

I'm pretty sure I know more than you do here, but I'll humor you. What facts do you think I'm missing?

Then you'd know it's not that the evidence presented at trial would remain sealed but that he wouldn't even be able to present it.

That's within the context of it being a trial open to the public.

> That's within the context of it being a trial open to the public.

Which the US Government is not allowing. We've looped back to the beginning here... and you still don't understand, don't accept, or don't know the entire narrative.

No, he won't be able to present evidence at any trial. It's much more than keeping some testimony sealed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com