2) Complaining about your analysis being 'insulted' comes off as petty. Ideas/analysis aren't sacred and they should be insulted if someone disagrees with them.
I have zero problem with criticizing my analysis with contradicting information, but the manner it comes across is relevant.
You can say something is wrong without calling it "a key mistake."
I was also put off by that part of your article, even though I agree that he should've credited you. But I could not discover any insult in any of your citations.
(I'm not claiming wether or not there was a key mistake, just whether or not it is insulting.)
I can definitely now see why you would interpret what I wrote as being malicious or mocking. I'd just like to let you know that it definitely wasn't meant to be, and that I'm incredibly sorry that it came off that way. I did not intend to offend you; I was just trying to explain why I made the choices I made.