Seems to be her meta-message.
Seems to be her meta-message.
https://college.harvard.edu/admissions/admissions-statistics
[1]
http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/06/how-to-...
[2]
http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/06/how-to-...
https://college.harvard.edu/admissions/admissions-statistics
Err, that's not at all what she said or even implied.
That's the point: they didn't work harder than anyone else applying to Harvard. They can't make decisions based on GPA/ACT/SAT scores, because everyone has the same top scores.
Hypothetically, and probably not that far off: So you have 10,000 applicants for a class of 2,000 and 8,000 of those applicants are valedictorians with extremely high SAT/ACT scores and they've managed to check all the regular boxes (played sports, instruments, etc.). How are you going to cull 6,000 applicants?
Another win for casual racism.
College admissions could really do with some sort of objective criteria. Because yeah, obviously human foibles always creep in.
Like GPA and SAT/ACT scores? Because they tried that. Secondary education is too easy and variable in the US, and Harvard can't really do much about that.