We've been seeing quite a bit in Afghanistan now where CAS is actually being performed by a B-1 carrying a SNIPER pod, sitting up at medium altitude with a large load of small precision bombs.
But that shows you the type of environment Afghanistan is, where the Air Force can deploy high value assets like a B-1 to perform CAS, because their anti-air threat is non-existent. The Air Force is not developing the F-35 to fight insurgents, they're deploying it to fight a well equipped, conventional force that will have multiple layers of sophisticated weapons. They'll do everything they can to soften these up before the strike aircraft go in. But there /will/ be some that remain, and its in this environment, that the F-35 needs to survive.
In the low-threat environment against insurgents, you can do that job just as well as the A-10 with the A-29 as the article states, for ever cheaper.
This is the conclusion that the Air Force has come to, and that's why they're retiring the A-10.