I can't see either side being 'right' here.
I can't see either side being 'right' here.
Billy says he owns it. Billy did have a hidden agenda.
Bobby at least owns a lot more than 0.04% of the company.
Had Billy hired the coders to do the work and say I own the company, I have no problem with that. But here, Billy tricks people to work on a project without fully disclosing his intention for virtually free, and than he claims he owns the company.
It's pretty clear who's wrong and who's right.
Billy came into the weekend with the intention to commit fraud on Startup Weekend and on any developers he could sucker into working with him.
It's like people have forgotten that we've got a lot easily-recordable evidence these days.
It's like people have forgotten that anyone can cherry-pick evidence to put themselves in the best light.