The backers got their money back. And the defendant lost a lot more money than just the restitution. The penalty was harsh, but I don't see why it was unjust.
Do you think the plaintiffs should get more money than they deserved?
Do you think the plaintiffs should get more money than they deserved?
I'll be charitable and assume you meant more money than they invested. What plaintiffs deserve is debatable, presupposing it is begging the question.