I can't see this principle as anything but incumbent crony capitalism and a completely unnecessary drag on the economy.
I can't see this principle as anything but incumbent crony capitalism and a completely unnecessary drag on the economy.
It's actually nothing like that. It's like Ford refusing to sell you parts for your car. Or Apple refusing to sell you parts for their computers. Nothing says you can't acquire parts from another manufacturer, nor is there anything preventing you from performing the repairs yourself. (Other than maybe warranty terms, which is IMO not a moral hazard.)
Incorrect.
> I'm not sure if you've been keeping up with US news, but this isn't true, at least until it's decided in court. GM, John Deere, and Ford all have the opposite opinion[1][2][3]
> [1]http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org/2015/04/john-deere-and....
> [2]https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150421/23581430744/gm-sa....
> [3]http://news.boldride.com/2015/04/gm-wants-to-make-working-on....
> Not to mention I think it's currently illegal to Jailbreak an iPhone or root an Android, despite them being yours.
> I really do wish the US was as cut/dry as you make it seem, and I wish they cared about consumers more, but in reality, Companies get far more rights then we, as consumers, do.
For instance: parts that refuse to work unless all other parts return a handshake containing a copyrighted message.